Sioux
Falls (my home town) splashed into the national news earlier this month when
NFL star Adrian Peterson attended the funeral of his 2 year-old son. His son
was killed in an apparent child abuse case. But wait a minute, why was his son
in Sioux Falls? Because the boy lived with his mom who is one of 7 women reported
to have birthed an Adrian-Peterson child.
Though
this event has generated much dispute about Peterson’s character, that discussion
should be secondary to a discussion about fatherhood in 21st century
America. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, Peterson’s dead son was one of 24
million children in America---one out of three---who live apart from their biological
fathers. This absence is triple the rate from 1960 and has an alarming impact
on these children. Comparing these children to those having an in-home father,
they are:
·
more likely to be poor—four times more likely!
·
more likely to die in infancy—nearly twice as likely
·
more likely to engage in delinquent behavior
·
more prone to early sexual activity
·
more often abused—often at the hands of a boyfriend!
·
more likely to abuse drugs and alcohol
·
more often obese
·
more academically challenged
·
more often neglected
In contrast,
kids with an in-home dad feel more secure, are more willing to take risks, and they
experience more positive emotional health.
There
is nothing automatic about the benefits of an in-home dad. (And it doesn’t mean
that father substitutes or separated fathers are worthless.) But being in the
home lays a solid foundation to build on and become the male model and guide
that children desperately need.
No comments:
Post a Comment